At the close of the plaintiff's evidence, which party may move for Judgment as a Matter of Law?

Prepare for the New York Multistate Bar Exam with comprehensive study resources. Access multiple-choice questions, detailed explanations, and exam tips to boost your preparation and confidence.

Multiple Choice

At the close of the plaintiff's evidence, which party may move for Judgment as a Matter of Law?

Explanation:
Judgment as a Matter of Law can be invoked when the evidentiary support for a party’s position is legally insufficient for a reasonable jury to return a verdict on that issue. After the plaintiff has presented all of their evidence, the defendant has been fully heard on the plaintiff’s claims and may move for JMOL to argue that there is not a legally sufficient basis to support a verdict for the plaintiff on those essential elements. If the court agrees, it can direct a verdict for the defendant on that issue. Note that a judge can also grant JMOL on its own initiative (sua sponte) if there is no legally sufficient evidentiary basis, but that is not a party’s motion. After all the evidence is in, either party may move for JMOL.

Judgment as a Matter of Law can be invoked when the evidentiary support for a party’s position is legally insufficient for a reasonable jury to return a verdict on that issue. After the plaintiff has presented all of their evidence, the defendant has been fully heard on the plaintiff’s claims and may move for JMOL to argue that there is not a legally sufficient basis to support a verdict for the plaintiff on those essential elements. If the court agrees, it can direct a verdict for the defendant on that issue.

Note that a judge can also grant JMOL on its own initiative (sua sponte) if there is no legally sufficient evidentiary basis, but that is not a party’s motion. After all the evidence is in, either party may move for JMOL.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Passetra

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy