In cumulative voting for directors, which formula determines the minimum shares to win one seat if there are s seats?

Prepare for the New York Multistate Bar Exam with comprehensive study resources. Access multiple-choice questions, detailed explanations, and exam tips to boost your preparation and confidence.

Multiple Choice

In cumulative voting for directors, which formula determines the minimum shares to win one seat if there are s seats?

Explanation:
In cumulative voting, you can concentrate all your votes on a single candidate. To guarantee winning one seat when there are s seats, you must command more than the share of votes that could be spread across the other s candidates. The minimum number of shares needed is the total voting power divided by (s + 1), with any fraction rounded up, and then you add one more vote to guarantee the win. This is exactly the form shown: divide total shares by (seats + 1), then add one. For example, with 100 total shares and four seats, you’d need floor(100/5) + 1 = 20 + 1 = 21 shares to guarantee a seat. This reflects why the threshold depends on the number of seats: as more seats are available, a smaller fraction is enough to win a seat, but you still need one more vote beyond that fractional threshold. Why other ideas don’t fit: dividing by the number of seats would imply an equal split without accounting for concentration of votes, and requiring 50% is too strong a condition when multiple seats are up for grabs. One vote per share describes simple plurality voting, not cumulative voting where votes can be pooled.

In cumulative voting, you can concentrate all your votes on a single candidate. To guarantee winning one seat when there are s seats, you must command more than the share of votes that could be spread across the other s candidates. The minimum number of shares needed is the total voting power divided by (s + 1), with any fraction rounded up, and then you add one more vote to guarantee the win. This is exactly the form shown: divide total shares by (seats + 1), then add one.

For example, with 100 total shares and four seats, you’d need floor(100/5) + 1 = 20 + 1 = 21 shares to guarantee a seat. This reflects why the threshold depends on the number of seats: as more seats are available, a smaller fraction is enough to win a seat, but you still need one more vote beyond that fractional threshold.

Why other ideas don’t fit: dividing by the number of seats would imply an equal split without accounting for concentration of votes, and requiring 50% is too strong a condition when multiple seats are up for grabs. One vote per share describes simple plurality voting, not cumulative voting where votes can be pooled.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Passetra

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy