In remedy for trustee self-dealing, courts typically do not inquire into which aspect?

Prepare for the New York Multistate Bar Exam with comprehensive study resources. Access multiple-choice questions, detailed explanations, and exam tips to boost your preparation and confidence.

Multiple Choice

In remedy for trustee self-dealing, courts typically do not inquire into which aspect?

Explanation:
Self-dealing breaches a trustee’s duty of loyalty, and courts remedy it by undoing the transaction and restoring the trust, or by disgorging the trustee’s profits. In this context, the trustee’s motive or belief is irrelevant to liability—the breach occurs regardless of good faith. So, when courts fashion remedies, they focus on undoing the self-dealing and making the beneficiaries whole, not on whether the trustee acted with good intentions. The existence of self-dealing is the trigger for liability, while the remedy may involve setting aside the transaction, awarding damages or profits, or removing the trustee; good faith doesn’t excuse the breach.

Self-dealing breaches a trustee’s duty of loyalty, and courts remedy it by undoing the transaction and restoring the trust, or by disgorging the trustee’s profits. In this context, the trustee’s motive or belief is irrelevant to liability—the breach occurs regardless of good faith. So, when courts fashion remedies, they focus on undoing the self-dealing and making the beneficiaries whole, not on whether the trustee acted with good intentions. The existence of self-dealing is the trigger for liability, while the remedy may involve setting aside the transaction, awarding damages or profits, or removing the trustee; good faith doesn’t excuse the breach.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Passetra

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy