Offer to pay medical expenses is inadmissible to prove liability.

• A. Admissible to prove liability
• B. Not admissible to prove liability
• C. Admissible for impeachment
• D. Admissible if the claim is disputed

Answer: (B)

The main idea here is the rule that prohibits evidence of paying or offering to pay medical expenses to prove who is liable for the injury. This rule aims to keep the focus on fault and the facts of the wrongdoing, rather than on generosity or settlements. So, an offer to cover someone’s medical bills isn’t admissible to establish liability.

That’s why the correct answer is that such an offer is not admissible to prove liability. The question’s other options don’t fit: the offer isn’t used to prove liability, and it isn’t a standard tool for impeachment. Also, the fact that the claim is disputed doesn’t make the offer admissible for liability; the prohibition applies regardless. (Note: actual medical expenses can be relevant to damages, separate from liability.)