Under CAFA, which statement about class actions is true?

Prepare for the New York Multistate Bar Exam with comprehensive study resources. Access multiple-choice questions, detailed explanations, and exam tips to boost your preparation and confidence.

Multiple Choice

Under CAFA, which statement about class actions is true?

Explanation:
CAFA expands federal jurisdiction for class actions by looking at three thresholds: class size, total amount in controversy, and minimal diversity. The true statement reflects that there must be 100 or more class members, more than $5 million in aggregate claims, and at least one plaintiff and one defendant from different states (minimal diversity). This means complete diversity isn’t required; any cross-state pairing between at least one plaintiff and one defendant suffices. The other options misstate how CAFA works: it does not require complete diversity, it doesn’t address settlement approval, and it doesn’t limit class actions to injunctive relief only.

CAFA expands federal jurisdiction for class actions by looking at three thresholds: class size, total amount in controversy, and minimal diversity. The true statement reflects that there must be 100 or more class members, more than $5 million in aggregate claims, and at least one plaintiff and one defendant from different states (minimal diversity). This means complete diversity isn’t required; any cross-state pairing between at least one plaintiff and one defendant suffices. The other options misstate how CAFA works: it does not require complete diversity, it doesn’t address settlement approval, and it doesn’t limit class actions to injunctive relief only.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Passetra

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy