Under the traditional common-law mirror image rule, which statement best describes acceptance?

Prepare for the New York Multistate Bar Exam with comprehensive study resources. Access multiple-choice questions, detailed explanations, and exam tips to boost your preparation and confidence.

Multiple Choice

Under the traditional common-law mirror image rule, which statement best describes acceptance?

Explanation:
Under the traditional common-law mirror image rule, acceptance must exactly reflect the terms of the offer. If the offeree adds, changes, or negotiates terms at all, the response isn’t an acceptance but a counteroffer that terminates the original offer. Silence does not count as acceptance, and the form or manner of acceptance doesn’t matter so long as the terms match precisely. So the only time acceptance is effective is when it exactly matches the offer; otherwise, the response creates a new offer for the original offeror to accept or reject. For example, if someone offers to sell a car for $10,000 and the other party says, “I’ll buy it for $9,500 and with a different delivery date,” that’s a counteroffer, not acceptance.

Under the traditional common-law mirror image rule, acceptance must exactly reflect the terms of the offer. If the offeree adds, changes, or negotiates terms at all, the response isn’t an acceptance but a counteroffer that terminates the original offer. Silence does not count as acceptance, and the form or manner of acceptance doesn’t matter so long as the terms match precisely.

So the only time acceptance is effective is when it exactly matches the offer; otherwise, the response creates a new offer for the original offeror to accept or reject. For example, if someone offers to sell a car for $10,000 and the other party says, “I’ll buy it for $9,500 and with a different delivery date,” that’s a counteroffer, not acceptance.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Passetra

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy