What is the remedy if a director breaches duty of loyalty and the benefits are disgorged?

Prepare for the New York Multistate Bar Exam with comprehensive study resources. Access multiple-choice questions, detailed explanations, and exam tips to boost your preparation and confidence.

Multiple Choice

What is the remedy if a director breaches duty of loyalty and the benefits are disgorged?

Explanation:
When a director breaches loyalty by self-dealing, the remedy focuses on undoing the improper transaction and returning the benefits to the corporation. The correct approach is to set aside the transaction and require the director to disgorge the profits, typically through a constructive trust. The corporate fiduciary cannot keep gains earned from a deal in which they had a personal interest; the constructive trust serves to restore the corporation’s position and prevent unjust enrichment by the director. By voiding the deal and placing the disgorged benefits in a trust for the corporation, the remedy directly addresses the breach and protects the corporation’s interests. Other options don’t fit because they fail to unwind the tainted transaction or recover the ill-gotten gains. Entering a new contract with the director would perpetuate the conflict, awarding compensation would reward the breach, and suspending the director addresses discipline but not the restitution of profits or the invalidation of the self-dealing transaction.

When a director breaches loyalty by self-dealing, the remedy focuses on undoing the improper transaction and returning the benefits to the corporation. The correct approach is to set aside the transaction and require the director to disgorge the profits, typically through a constructive trust. The corporate fiduciary cannot keep gains earned from a deal in which they had a personal interest; the constructive trust serves to restore the corporation’s position and prevent unjust enrichment by the director. By voiding the deal and placing the disgorged benefits in a trust for the corporation, the remedy directly addresses the breach and protects the corporation’s interests.

Other options don’t fit because they fail to unwind the tainted transaction or recover the ill-gotten gains. Entering a new contract with the director would perpetuate the conflict, awarding compensation would reward the breach, and suspending the director addresses discipline but not the restitution of profits or the invalidation of the self-dealing transaction.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Passetra

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy