Which damages are not subject to Article 16 limits?

Unlock all questions

This demo includes only 20 questions. Upgrade to access hundreds of questions, flashcards, exam simulations, and disable ads.

Full question bankExam simulationsFlashcards
From $25.99Unlock all

Prepare for the New York Multistate Bar Exam with comprehensive study resources. Access multiple-choice questions, detailed explanations, and exam tips to boost your preparation and confidence.

Multiple Choice

Which damages are not subject to Article 16 limits?

Explanation:
The main idea is that Article 16 caps apply to non-economic losses, not to economic ones. Economic damages—like medical expenses and lost wages—are not limited by Article 16, so they are not subject to those caps. In a personal injury case, you can recover these out-of-pocket and income-loss costs in full, while noneconomic damages such as pain and suffering are capped. That’s why economic damages are the correct choice. The other options don’t fit because non-economic damages are the ones capped, “personal injury damages” is too broad and includes non-economic losses, and “all damages” would imply everything is capped, which is not the case.

The main idea is that Article 16 caps apply to non-economic losses, not to economic ones. Economic damages—like medical expenses and lost wages—are not limited by Article 16, so they are not subject to those caps. In a personal injury case, you can recover these out-of-pocket and income-loss costs in full, while noneconomic damages such as pain and suffering are capped. That’s why economic damages are the correct choice. The other options don’t fit because non-economic damages are the ones capped, “personal injury damages” is too broad and includes non-economic losses, and “all damages” would imply everything is capped, which is not the case.

More Multiple Choice Questions
Subscribe

Get the latest from Passetra

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy