Which of the following is an exception to the usual rule that delivered goods cannot be reclaimed?

Prepare for the New York Multistate Bar Exam with comprehensive study resources. Access multiple-choice questions, detailed explanations, and exam tips to boost your preparation and confidence.

Multiple Choice

Which of the following is an exception to the usual rule that delivered goods cannot be reclaimed?

Explanation:
Under the sale of goods framework, a seller generally cannot reclaim goods that have been delivered and accepted by the buyer. But there are specific exceptions to that rule. One notable exception is misrepresentation within a short period after delivery. If the buyer misrepresented solvency or creditworthiness to obtain the goods, the seller can reclaim within a 3-month window after delivery because the sale was induced by fraud. This misrepresentation undermines the basis on which credit was extended, so the seller has a right to unwind and recover the goods even after delivery. The other options don’t establish that reclaim right in the same way. A demand to return within 10 days is a procedural requirement for reclamation in certain insolvency scenarios, not the independent basis for reclamation itself. A buyer’s decision to keep the goods ends the possibility of reclaim, and insolvency at the time of delivery is another recognized basis for reclamation, but the item focusing on misrepresentation within 3 months directly captures a distinct exception that the question is highlighting.

Under the sale of goods framework, a seller generally cannot reclaim goods that have been delivered and accepted by the buyer. But there are specific exceptions to that rule. One notable exception is misrepresentation within a short period after delivery. If the buyer misrepresented solvency or creditworthiness to obtain the goods, the seller can reclaim within a 3-month window after delivery because the sale was induced by fraud. This misrepresentation undermines the basis on which credit was extended, so the seller has a right to unwind and recover the goods even after delivery.

The other options don’t establish that reclaim right in the same way. A demand to return within 10 days is a procedural requirement for reclamation in certain insolvency scenarios, not the independent basis for reclamation itself. A buyer’s decision to keep the goods ends the possibility of reclaim, and insolvency at the time of delivery is another recognized basis for reclamation, but the item focusing on misrepresentation within 3 months directly captures a distinct exception that the question is highlighting.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Passetra

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy