Which of the following is a policy exception to the admissibility of relevant evidence?

Prepare for the New York Multistate Bar Exam with comprehensive study resources. Access multiple-choice questions, detailed explanations, and exam tips to boost your preparation and confidence.

Multiple Choice

Which of the following is a policy exception to the admissibility of relevant evidence?

Explanation:
Subsequent remedial measures are excluded for policy reasons: after an event, evidence of repairs or changes made to prevent recurrence is not admitted to prove negligence, culpable conduct, or product defect. The rule encourages people to fix dangerous conditions without worrying that their corrective actions will be used against them as proof of fault. The other items don’t rest on this kind of policy exclusion. Habit evidence is allowed to show a pattern of conduct in response to familiar situations, while character and opinion evidence follow separate evidentiary rules about admissibility.

Subsequent remedial measures are excluded for policy reasons: after an event, evidence of repairs or changes made to prevent recurrence is not admitted to prove negligence, culpable conduct, or product defect. The rule encourages people to fix dangerous conditions without worrying that their corrective actions will be used against them as proof of fault. The other items don’t rest on this kind of policy exclusion. Habit evidence is allowed to show a pattern of conduct in response to familiar situations, while character and opinion evidence follow separate evidentiary rules about admissibility.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Passetra

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy